🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.