🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it because then none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.